The Human Experiment: There are two thresholds between understanding the map and navigating the territory, one conceptual, one of orientation and scale. There is a critical and dangerous impulse in the problem-solving process: to race to implementation before "problem-perceiving" and "problem-defining" are complete, or even stable. AN INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION Every question seeks an answer but requires another: "Is that the right question?" Editorials and talking heads ask, "Why didn't we see this coming?" or, "How did they allow this to happen?" What this did we not see? Which this flew in under the radar? How many of this were swept under the mental rug? The unnecessary war or the inevitable crash? Global warming or health care? The Bush madness or the necessity of an Obama? Or the idea we would have to confront a mindset? |
To notice or admit my denial I have to observe it from a different mental POV. Einstein said, "The significant problems we have cannot be solved at the same level of thinking with which we created them." But we cannot continue to take steps back from every mental frame, as if in an infinite retreat. Once the issue of a mindset and the problem of denial are acknowledged, we are in a position to perceive more flexibly the reality that surrounds us. Once the veil of assumptions and preconceptions is lifted, or even noticed, the entire situation can be seen in a different light. The problem, the crisis, the mental frame, the fear, the beauty, the limits and the opportunities: all can be re-imagined. |